Writing up rather than writing down: Becoming Wikipedia Literate
|Writing up rather than writing down: Becoming Wikipedia Literate|
|Author(s)||Heather Ford, R. Stuart Geiger|
|Keyword(s)||Literacy, Wikipedia, new literacies, educational technology, ethnography (Extra: ethnography, literacy, MediaWiki, new literacies, Organizational forms, Qualitative study, Wikipedia, Educational technology, Websites)|
|Article||BASE, CiteSeerX, Google Scholar|
|Web||Ask, Bing, Google (PDF), Yahoo!|
|Download and mirrors|
|Local copy||Not available|
|Export and share|
|BibTeX, CSV, RDF, JSON|
|Browse properties · List of conference papers|
Editing Wikipedia is certainly not as simple as learning the MediaWiki syntax and knowing where the “edit” bar is, but how do we conceptualize the cultural and organizational understandings that make an effective contributor? We draw on work of literacy practitioner and theorist Richard Darville to advocate a multi-faceted theory of literacy that sheds light on what new knowledges and organizational forms are required to improve participation in Wikipedia’s communities. We outline what Darville refers to as the “background knowledges” required to be an empowered, literate member and apply this to the Wikipedia community. Using a series of examples drawn from interviews with new editors and qualitative studies of controversies in Wikipedia, we identify and outline several different literacy asymmetries.
- This section requires expansion. Please, help!
Cited byThis publication has 1 citations. Only those publications available in WikiPapers are shown here: