Wiki-Philosophizing in a Marketplace of Ideas: Evaluating Wikipedia’s Entries on Seven Great Minds
|Wiki-Philosophizing in a Marketplace of Ideas: Evaluating Wikipedia's Entries on Seven Great Minds|
|Published in||SSRN Electronic Journal|
|Keyword(s)||Wikipedia, Information, Information Market, Encyclopedia, Media, New Media, Participatory Media, Philosophy, Marketplace of Ideas|
|Article||BASE, CiteSeerX, Google Scholar|
|Web||Ask, Bing, Google (PDF), Yahoo!|
|Download and mirrors|
|Local copy||Not available|
|Export and share|
|BibTeX, CSV, RDF, JSON|
|Browse properties · List of journal articles|
Wiki-Philosophizing in a Marketplace of Ideas: Evaluating Wikipedia's Entries on Seven Great Minds is a 2007 journal article written in English by George Bragues and published in SSRN Electronic Journal.
A very conspicuous part of the new participatory media, Wikipedia has emerged as the Internet's leading source of all-purpose information, the volume and range of its articles far surpassing that of its traditional rival, the Encyclopedia Britannica. This has been accomplished by permitting virtually anyone to contribute, either by writing an original article or editing an existing one. With almost no entry barriers to the production of information, the result is that Wikipedia exhibits a perfectly competitive marketplace of ideas. It has often been argued that such a marketplace is the best guarantee that quality information will be generated and disseminated.
We test this contention by examining Wikipedia's entries on seven top Western philosophers. These entries are evaluated against the consensus view elicited from four academic reference works in philosophy. Wikipedia's performance turns out to be decidedly mixed. Its average coverage rate of consensus topics is 52%, while the median rate is 56%. A qualitative analysis uncovered no outright errors, though there were significant omissions. The online encyclopedia's harnessing of the marketplace of ideas, though not unimpressive, fails to emerge as clearly superior to the traditional alternative of relying on individual expertise for information.
This publication has 7 references. Only those references related to wikis are included here:
- "Among the audience: A Survey of New Media" (create it!)
- "Wissenswettstreit. Die kostenlose Wikipedia tritt gegen die Marktführer Encarta und Brockhaus an" (create it!)
- "Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for Evaluating collaborative media as a news resource"
- "Can Wikipedia Ever Make the Grade?" (create it!)
Cited byThis publication has 4 citations. Only those publications available in WikiPapers are shown here:
- Assessing the accuracy and quality of Wikipedia entries compared to popular online encyclopaedias
- Hackers, Cyborgs, and Wikipedians: The Political Economy and Cultural History of Wikipedia
- What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s)
- Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage