Browse wiki

Jump to: navigation, search
Information quality work organization in Wikipedia
Abstract The classic problem within the informationThe classic problem within the information quality (IQ) research and practice community has been the problem of defining IQ. It has been found repeatedly that IQ is context sensitive and cannot be described, measured, and assured with a single model. There is a need for empirical case studies of IQ work in different systems to develop a systematic knowledge that can then inform and guide the construction of context-specific IQ models. This article analyzes the organization of IQ assurance work in a large-scale, open, collaborative encyclopedia-Wikipedia. What is special about Wikipedia as a resource is that the quality discussions and processes are strongly connected to the data itself and are accessible to the general public. This openness makes it particularly easy for researchers to study a particular kind of collaborative work that is highly distributed and that has a particularly substantial focus, not just on error detection but also on error correction. We believe that the study of those evolving debates and processes and of the IQ assurance model as a whole has useful implications for the improvement of quality in other more conventional databases.lity in other more conventional databases.
Abstractsub The classic problem within the informationThe classic problem within the information quality (IQ) research and practice community has been the problem of defining IQ. It has been found repeatedly that IQ is context sensitive and cannot be described, measured, and assured with a single model. There is a need for empirical case studies of IQ work in different systems to develop a systematic knowledge that can then inform and guide the construction of context-specific IQ models. This article analyzes the organization of IQ assurance work in a large-scale, open, collaborative encyclopedia-Wikipedia. What is special about Wikipedia as a resource is that the quality discussions and processes are strongly connected to the data itself and are accessible to the general public. This openness makes it particularly easy for researchers to study a particular kind of collaborative work that is highly distributed and that has a particularly substantial focus, not just on error detection but also on error correction. We believe that the study of those evolving debates and processes and of the IQ assurance model as a whole has useful implications for the improvement of quality in other more conventional databases.lity in other more conventional databases.
Bibtextype misc  +
Citeulike 2805226  +
Doi 10.1002/asi.20813  +
Has author Besiki Stvilia + , Michael B. Twidale + , Linda C. Smith + , Les Gasser +
Has remote mirror http://www.isrl.illinois.edu/~gasser/papers/stvilia-etal-info-qual-work-org-in-wikipedia.pdf  +
Language English +
Number of citations by publication 8  +
Number of references by publication 0  +
Pages 983-1001  +
Title Information quality work organization in Wikipedia +
Type unknown  +
Year 2008 +
Creation dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 28 January 2012 21:09:00  +
Categories Publications without published in parameter  + , Publications without keywords parameter  + , Publications without license parameter  + , Publications without archive mirror parameter  + , Publications without paywall mirror parameter  + , Publications without references parameter  + , Publications  +
Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 20 September 2014 17:56:10  +
DateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 2008  +
hide properties that link here 
A Brief Review of Studies of Wikipedia in Peer-Reviewed Journals + , Citation needed: The dynamics of referencing in Wikipedia + , Ideological Segregation among Online Collaborators: Evidence from Wikipedians + , Is Wikipedia Inefficient? Modelling Effort and Participation in Wikipedia + , On the Accuracy of Urban Crowd-Sourcing for Maintaining Large-Scale Geospatial Databases + , The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System: How Wikipedia's Reaction to Sudden Popularity is Causing its Decline + , The visibility of Wikipedia in scholarly publications + , What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s) + , Wikipédia e enciclopédia britânica: Informação confiável? + Has reference
Information quality work organization in Wikipedia + Title
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.