Rich Texts: Wikisource as an Open Access Repository for Law and the Humanities

From WikiPapers
Jump to: navigation, search

Rich Texts: Wikisource as an Open Access Repository for Law and the Humanities is a 2010 publication written in English by Timothy K. Armstrong and published in University of Cincinnati College of Law Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series.

[edit] Abstract

Open access to research and scholarship, although well established in the sciences, remains an emerging phenomenon in the legal academy. In recent years, a number of open access repositories have been created to permit self-archiving of legal scholarship (either within or across institutional boundaries), and faculties at some leading research institutions have adopted policies supporting open access to their work. Although existing repositories for legal scholarship represent a clear improvement over proprietary, subscription-based repositories in some ways, their architecture, and the narrowly defined missions they have elected to pursue, limit their ability to illuminate the ongoing dialogue among texts that is a defining characteristic of scholarly discourse in law and the humanities. One of the wiki-based projects operated by the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation - the Wikisource digital library - improves upon the shortcomings of existing open access repositories by bringing source texts and commentary together in a single place, with additional contextual materials hosted on other Wikimedia Foundation sites just a click away. These features of Wikisource, if more widely adopted, may improve academic discourse by highlighting conceptual interconnections among works, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and reducing the competitive advantages of proprietary, closed-access legal information services.

[edit] References

This publication has 3 references. Only those references related to wikis are included here:

Cited by

Probably, this publication is cited by others, but there are no articles available for them in WikiPapers.

Discussion

No comments yet. Be first!