Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources
|Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources|
|Author(s)||N. J. Reavley, A. J. Mackinnon, A. J. Morgan, M. Alvarez-Jimenez, S. E. Hetrick, E. Killackey, B. Nelson, R. Purcell, M. B. Yap, A. F. Jorm|
|Published in||Psychological medicine|
|Article||BASE, CiteSeerX, Google Scholar|
|Web||Ask, Bing, Google (PDF), Yahoo!|
|Download and mirrors|
|Local copy||Not available|
|Remote mirror(s)||Not available|
|Export and share|
|BibTeX, CSV, RDF, JSON|
|Browse properties · List of publications|
Quality of information sources about mental disorders: a comparison of Wikipedia with centrally controlled web and printed sources is a 2011 publication written in English by N. J. Reavley, A. J. Mackinnon, A. J. Morgan, M. Alvarez-Jimenez, S. E. Hetrick, E. Killackey, B. Nelson, R. Purcell, M. B. Yap, A. F. Jorm and published in Psychological medicine.
BACKGROUND: Although mental health information on the internet is often of poor quality, relatively little is known about the quality of websites, such as Wikipedia, that involve participatory information sharing. The aim of this paper was to explore the quality of user-contributed mental health-related information on Wikipedia and compare this with centrally controlled information sources.MethodContent on 10 mental health-related topics was extracted from 14 frequently accessed websites (including Wikipedia) providing information about depression and schizophrenia, Encyclopaedia Britannica, and a psychiatry textbook. The content was rated by experts according to the following criteria: accuracy, up-to-dateness, breadth of coverage, referencing and readability. RESULTS: Ratings varied significantly between resources according to topic. Across all topics, Wikipedia was the most highly rated in all domains except readability. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of information on depression and schizophrenia on Wikipedia is generally as good as, or better than, that provided by centrally controlled websites, Encyclopaedia Britannica and a psychiatry textbook.
- This section requires expansion. Please, help!
Cited byThis publication has 2 citations. Only those publications available in WikiPapers are shown here:
- Assessing the accuracy and quality of Wikipedia entries compared to popular online encyclopaedias
- PLoS Computational Biology Meets Wikipedia