Methods for evaluating information sources: An annotated catalogue

From WikiPapers
Jump to: navigation, search

Methods for evaluating information sources: An annotated catalogue is a 2012 literature review written in English by Hjorland B. and published in Journal of Information Science.

[edit] Abstract

The article briefly presents and discusses 12 different approaches to the evaluation of information sources (for example a Wikipedia entry or a journal article): (1) the checklist approach; (2) classical peer review; (3) modified peer review; (4) evaluation based on examining the coverage of controversial views; (5) evidence-based evaluation; (6) comparative studies; (7) author credentials; (8) publisher reputation; (9) journal impact factor; (10) sponsoring: tracing the influence of economic, political, and ideological interests; (11) book reviews and book reviewing; and (12) broader criteria. Reading a text is often not a simple process. All the methods discussed here are steps on the way on learning how to read, understand, and criticize texts. According to hermeneutics it involves the subjectivity of the reader, and that subjectivity is influenced, more or less, by different theoretical perspectives. Good, scholarly reading is to be aware of different perspectives, and to situate oneself among them.

[edit] References

This publication has 0 references. Only those references related to wikis are included here:

 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;

Cited by

Probably, this publication is cited by others, but there are no articles available for them in WikiPapers. Cited 7 time(s)