Maja van der Velden
| Maja van der Velden|
(Alternative names for this author)
|Co-authors||Alan Shapiro, Amila Akdag Salah, Andrea Scharnhorst, Andrew Famiglietti, Cheng Gao, Christian Stegbauer, Dan O’Sullivan, Dror Kamir, Edgar Enyedy, Florian Cramer, Gautam John, Geert Lovink, Hans Varghese Mathews, Heather Ford, Johanna Niesyto, Joseph M. Reagle, Krzystztof Suchecki, Lawrence Liang, Mark Graham, Matheiu O’Neil, Mayo Fuster Morell, Morgan Currie, Nathaniel Stern, Nathaniel Tkacz, Nicholas Carr, Patrick Lichty, Peter B. Kaufman, R. Stuart Geiger, Scott Kildall, Shun-ling Chen|
|Authorship||Publications (2), datasets (0), tools (0)|
|Citations||Total (4), average (2), median (2), max (4), min (0)|
|DBLP · Google Scholar|
|Export and share|
|BibTeX, CSV, RDF, JSON|
|Browse properties · List of authors|
Maja van der Velden is an author.
PublicationsOnly those publications related to wikis are shown here.
|Title||Keyword(s)||Published in||Language||DateThis property is a special property in this wiki.||Abstract||R||C|
|Decentering Design: Wikipedia and Indigenous Knowledge||International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction||English||2013||This article is a reflection on the case of Wikipedia, the largest online reference site with 23 million articles, with 365 million readers, and without a page called Indigenous knowledge. A Postcolonial Computing lens, extended with the notion of decentering, is used to find out what happened with Indigenous knowledge in Wikipedia. Wikipedia's ordering technologies, such as policies and templates, play a central role in producing knowledge. Two designs, developed with and for Indigenous communities, are introduced to explore if another Wikipedia's design is possible.||0||0|
|Critical Point of View: A Wikipedia Reader||Institute of Network Cultures||English||2011||For millions of internet users around the globe, the search for new knowledge begins with Wikipedia. The encyclopedia’s rapid rise, novel organization, and freely offered content have been marveled at and denounced by a host of commentators. Critical Point of View moves beyond unflagging praise, well-worn facts, and questions about its reliability and accuracy, to unveil the complex, messy, and controversial realities of a distributed knowledge platform.||0||4|