Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
From WikiPapers
(Redirected from Internet encyclopedias go head to head)
| Internet encyclopaedias go head to head | |
| Author(s) | Jim Giles |
| Published in | Nature |
| Date | 2005-12-14 |
| Volume | 438 |
| Issue | Unknown [+] |
| Page(s) | 900-901 |
| Keyword(s) | Unknown [+] (Extra: accuracy, authorship, quality) |
| Peer-reviewed? | Yes |
| Language(s) | English |
| License(s) | Unknown [+] |
| Identifiers | |
| ISBN | Unknown [+] |
| DOI | 10.1038/438900a |
| OCLC Number | Unknown [+] |
| CiteULike | Unknown [+] |
| arXiv | Unknown [+] |
| PubMed | Unknown [+] |
| Related material | |
| Concept(s) | Unknown [+] |
| Tool(s) | Unknown [+] |
| Dataset(s) | Unknown [+] |
| Slides | Not available [+] |
| Presentation | Not available [+] |
| Search | |
| Article | BASE, CiteSeerX, Google Scholar |
| Web | Ask, Bing, Google (PDF), Yahoo! |
| Download and mirrors | |
| Local copy | Not available [+] |
| Remote mirror(s) | www2.stat.unibo.it |
| Archive(s) | Not available [+] |
| Paywall(s) | www.nature.com |
| Export and share | |
| BibTeX, CSV, RDF, JSON | |
      
| |
| Browse properties · List of journal articles | |
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head is a 2005 journal article written in English by Jim Giles and published in Nature.
[edit] Abstract
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.
[edit] References
- This section requires expansion. Please, help!
Cited by
This publication has 36 citations. Only those publications available in WikiPapers are shown here:- A Brief Review of Studies of Wikipedia in Peer-Reviewed Journals
- A Characterization of Wikipedia Content Based on Motifs in the Edit Graph
- A Cross-Lingual Dictionary for English Wikipedia Concepts
- Assessing the accuracy and quality of Wikipedia entries compared to popular online encyclopaedias
- Avoiding Tragedy in the Wiki-Commons
- Coisas velhas em coisas novas: novas “velhas tecnologias”
- Cultural bias in Wikipedia content on famous persons
- Detecting Wikipedia Vandalism via Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Revision Metadata
- Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia
- Enciclopédias na web 2.0: colaboração e moderação na Wikipédia e Britannica Online
- Evaluating WikiTrust: A trust support tool for Wikipedia
- Fixing the floating gap: The online encyclopaedia Wikipedia as a global memory place
- From Encyclopædia Britannica to Wikipedia: Generational differences in the perceived credibility of online encyclopedia information
- Improving Wikipedia's credibility: References and citations in a sample of history articles
- L'édition de référence libre et collaborative : le cas de Wikipédia
- Ler, escrever, editar comentar, voltar... Os desafios do letramento digital na web 2.0
- Locapedias: Generación de contenido local de manera colaborativa
- On the Accuracy of Urban Crowd-Sourcing for Maintaining Large-Scale Geospatial Databases
- PLoS Computational Biology Meets Wikipedia
- Processos editoriais auto-organizados na Wikipédia em português: a edição colaborativa de "Biografias de Pessoas Vivas"
- Putting Wikipedia to the Test: A Case Study
- Reference Blindness: The Influence of References on Trust in Wikipedia
- Researching Wikipedia ‐ Current approaches and new directions
- Scientific citations in Wikipedia
- Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter?
- Semi-automatic enrichment of crowdsourced synonymy networks: the WISIGOTH system applied to Wiktionary
- Social networks of Wikipedia
- Textual curators and writing machines: authorial agency in encyclopedias, print to digital
- The Gene Wiki: community intelligence applied to human gene annotation
- The RNA WikiProject: community annotation of RNA families
- The visibility of Wikipedia in scholarly publications
- Um método automático para estimativa da qualidade de enciclopédias colaborativas on-line: um estudo de caso sobre a Wikipédia
- Understanding collaboration in Wikipedia
- Using Wikipedia to develop language resources: WordNet 3.0 in Catalan and Spanish
- Visual analysis of controversy in user-generated encyclopedias
- What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s)
- What’s on Wikipedia and What’s Not... ?
- Why ornithologists should embrace and contribute to Wikipedia
- Wiki Readers Wiki Writers
- Wiki-Philosophizing in a Marketplace of Ideas: Evaluating Wikipedia’s Entries on Seven Great Minds
- Wikipedia as a Data Source for Political Scientists: Accuracy and Completeness of Coverage
- Wikipedia research and tools: Review and comments
- Wikipédia como espaço de interações e a redação coletiva de artigos sobre o vôo TAM 3054
- Wikipédia e enciclopédia britânica: Informação confiável?
- Wikipédia. Une somme originale de copies
- Wikis in Libraries
- Zawilinski: a library for studying grammar in Wiktionary
[edit] Additional information and Britannica vs Nature discussion
- Supplementary information
- Fatally Flawed: Refuting the recent study on encyclopedic accuracy by the journal Nature
- Nature's responses to Encyclopaedia Britannica
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Press_releases/Nature_compares_Wikipedia_and_Britannica
Discussion
No comments yet. Be first!
