Improving Wikipedia's credibility: References and citations in a sample of history articles

From WikiPapers
Jump to: navigation, search

Improving Wikipedia's credibility: References and citations in a sample of history articles is a 2010 journal article written in English by Brendan Luyt, Daniel Tan and published in J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[edit] Abstract

This study evaluates how well the authors of Wikipedia history articles adhere to the site’s policy of assuring verifiability through citations. It does so by examining the references and citations of a subset of country histories. The findings paint a dismal picture. Not only are many claims not verified through citations, those that are suffer from the choice of references used. Many of these are from only a few US government Websites or news media and few are to academic journal material. Given these results, one response would be to declare Wikipedia unsuitable for serious reference work. But another option emerges when we jettison technological determinism and look at Wikipedia as a product of a wider social context. Key to this context is a world in which information is bottled up as commodities requiring payment for access. Equally important is the problematic assumption that texts are undifferentiated bearers of knowledge. Those involved in instructional programs can draw attention to the social nature of texts to counter these assumptions and by so doing create an awareness for a new generation of Wikipedians and Wikipedia users of the need to evaluate texts (and hence citations) in light of the social context of their production and use.

[edit] References

This publication has 11 references. Only those references related to wikis are included here:

  • "Public history and its discontents or history in the age of Wikipedia" (create it!) [search]
  • "A tale of information ethics and encyclopedias; or, is Wikipedia just another Internet scam?" (create it!) [search]
  • "TheWikipedian revolution: How a bunch of nobodies created the world’s greatest encyclopedia" (create it!) [search]
  • "Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedia for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles" (create it!) [search]
  • "Socrates back on the street: Wikipedia’s citing of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (create it!) [search]

Cited by

This publication has 2 citations. Only those publications available in WikiPapers are shown here:


Discussion

No comments yet. Be first!