Governance in social media: A case study of the Wikipedia promotion process
|Governance in social media: A case study of the Wikipedia promotion process|
|Author(s)||Leskovec J., Huttenlocher D., Kleinberg J.|
|Published in||ICWSM 2010 - Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media|
|Keyword(s)||Unknown (Extra: Deliberative process, Group decision-making, Social media, Wikipedia, Decision making, Social networking (online))|
|Article||BASE, CiteSeerX, Google Scholar|
|Web||Ask, Bing, Google (PDF), Yahoo!|
|Download and mirrors|
|Local copy||Not available|
|Remote mirror(s)||Not available|
|Export and share|
|BibTeX, CSV, RDF, JSON|
|Browse properties · List of conference papers|
Governance in social media: A case study of the Wikipedia promotion process is a 2010 conference paper written in English by Leskovec J., Huttenlocher D., Kleinberg J. and published in ICWSM 2010 - Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
Social media sites are often guided by a core group of committed users engaged in various forms of governance. A crucial aspect of this type of governance is deliberation, inwhich such a group reaches decisions on issues of importance to the site. Despite its crucial - though subtle - role in how a number of prominent social media sites function, there has been relatively little investigation of the deliberative aspects of social media governance. Here we explore this issue, investigating a particular deliberative process that is extensive, public, and recorded: the promotion of Wikipedia admins, which is determined by elections that engage committed members of the Wikipedia community. We find that the group decision-making at the heart of this process exhibits several fundamental forms of relative assessment. First we observe that the chance that a voter will support a candidate is strongly dependent on the relationship between characteristics of the voter and the candidate. Second we investigate how both individual voter decisions and overall election outcomes can be based on models that take into account the sequential, public nature of the voting. Copyright © 2010, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.
- This section requires expansion. Please, help!
Cited byThis publication has 3 citations. Only those publications available in WikiPapers are shown here:
- Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia
- Social networks of Wikipedia
- What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s)
Cited 10 time(s)