| editorial activity|
(Alternative names for this keyword)
|Export and share|
|BibTeX, CSV, RDF, JSON|
|Browse properties · List of keywords|
editorial activity is included as keyword or extra keyword in 0 datasets, 1 tools and 4 publications.
There is no datasets for this keyword.
|Tool||Operating System(s)||Language(s)||Programming language(s)||License||Description||Image|
|WikipediaVision||Web||English||WikipediaVision is a web-based tool that shows anonymous edits to Wikipedia (almost) in real-time.|
|Title||Author(s)||Published in||Language||DateThis property is a special property in this wiki.||Abstract||R||C|
|Reverts Revisited: Accurate Revert Detection in Wikipedia||Fabian Flöck
|Hypertext and Social Media 2012||English||June 2012||Wikipedia is commonly used as a proving ground for research in collaborative systems. This is likely due to its popularity and scale, but also to the fact that large amounts of data about its formation and evolution are freely available to inform and validate theories and models of online collaboration. As part of the development of such approaches, revert detection is often performed as an important pre-processing step in tasks as diverse as the extraction of implicit networks of editors, the analysis of edit or editor features and the removal of noise when analyzing the emergence of the con-tent of an article. The current state of the art in revert detection is based on a rather naïve approach, which identifies revision duplicates based on MD5 hash values. This is an efficient, but not very precise technique that forms the basis for the majority of research based on revert relations in Wikipedia. In this paper we prove that this method has a number of important drawbacks - it only detects a limited number of reverts, while simultaneously misclassifying too many edits as reverts, and not distinguishing between complete and partial reverts. This is very likely to hamper the accurate interpretation of the findings of revert-related research. We introduce an improved algorithm for the detection of reverts based on word tokens added or deleted to adresses these drawbacks. We report on the results of a user study and other tests demonstrating the considerable gains in accuracy and coverage by our method, and argue for a positive trade-off, in certain research scenarios, between these improvements and our algorithm’s increased runtime.||13||0|
|Edição colaborativa na Wikipédia: desafios e possibilidades||Carlos Frederico de Brito d’Andréa||Educação científica e cidadania: abordagens teóricas e metodológicas para a formação de pesquisadores juvenis||Portuguese||March 2012||14||1|
|Circadian patterns of Wikipedia editorial activity: A demographic analysis||Taha Yasseri
|PLoS ONE||English||2012||Wikipedia (WP) as a collaborative, dynamical system of humans is an appropriate subject of social studies. Each single action of the members of this society, i.e. editors, is well recorded and accessible. Using the cumulative data of 34 Wikipedias in different languages, we try to characterize and find the universalities and differences in temporal activity patterns of editors. Based on this data, we estimate the geographical distribution of editors for each WP in the globe. Furthermore we also clarify the differences among different groups of WPs, which originate in the variance of cultural and social features of the communities of editors.||10||2|
|Auto-organização e processos editoriais na Wikipédia: uma análise à luz de Michel Debrun||Carlos Frederico de Brito d’Andréa||Leitura e escrita em movimento||Portuguese||2010||0||1|