Comparison

comparison (Alternative names for this keyword)
Related keyword(s)	Unknown [+]
Export and share
BibTeX, CSV, RDF, JSON
Browse properties · List of keywords

comparison is included as keyword or extra keyword in 0 datasets, 0 tools and 3 publications.

Datasets

There is no datasets for this keyword.

Tools

There is no tools for this keyword.

Publications

Title	Author(s)	Published in	Language	DateThis property is a special property in this wiki.	Abstract	R	C
Assessing the accuracy and quality of Wikipedia entries compared to popular online encyclopaedias	Imogen Casebourne Chris Davies Michelle Fernandes Naomi Norman		English	2 August 2012		8	0
Identifying controversial articles in Wikipedia: A comparative study	Hoda Sepehri Rad Denilson Barbosa	WikiSym	English	August 2012	Wikipedia articles are the result of the collaborative editing of a diverse group of anonymous volunteer editors, who are passionate and knowledgeable about specific topics. One can argue that this plurality of perspectives leads to broader coverage of the topic, thus benefitting the reader. On the other hand, differences among editors on polarizing topics can lead to controversial or questionable content, where facts and arguments are presented and discussed to support a particular point of view. Controversial articles are manually tagged by Wikipedia editors, and span many interesting and popular topics, such as religion, history, and politics, to name a few. Recent works have been proposed on automatically identifying controversy within unmarked articles. However, to date, no systematic comparison of these efforts has been made. This is in part because the various methods are evaluated using different criteria and on different sets of articles by different authors, making it hard for anyone to verify the efficacy and compare all alternatives. We provide a first attempt at bridging this gap. We compare five different methods for modelling and identifying controversy, and discuss some of the unique difficulties and opportunities inherent to the way Wikipedia is produced.	0	0
Exploring linguistic points of view of Wikipedia	Paolo Massa Federico Scrinzi	WikiSym	English	2011	The 3 million articles of the English Wikipedia has been written since 2011 by more than 14 million volunteers. On each article, the community of editors strive to reach a neutral point of view, representing all significant views fairly, proportionately, and without bias. However, beside the English one, there are more than 270 Wikipedias in different languages and their relatively isolated communities of editors are not forced by the platform to discuss and negotiate their points of view. So the empirical question is: do communities on different languages editions of Wikipedia develop their own diverse Linguistic Points of View (LPOV)? To answer this question we created Manypedia, a web tool whose goal is to ease cross-cultural comparisons of Wikipedia language communities by analyzing their different representations of the same topic.	0	1