Change in access after digitization: Ethnographic collections in Wikipedia

From WikiPapers
Jump to: navigation, search

Change in access after digitization: Ethnographic collections in Wikipedia is a 2015 journal article written in English by Trilce Navarrete, Karol J. Borowiecki and published in ACEI Working Paper Series.

[edit] Abstract

The raison d’être of memory institutions revolves around collecting, preserving and giving access to heritage collections. Increasingly, access takes place in social networked markets characterized by communities of users that serve to select and rank content to facilitate reuse. Publication of heritage in such digital medium transforms patterns of consumption. We performed a quantitative analysis on the access to a museum collection and compared results before and after publication on Wikimedia. Analysis of the difference in access showed two main results: first, access to collections increased substantially online. From a selection of the most viewed objects, access grew from an average of 156,000 onsite visitors per year (or 15.5 million in a century) to over 1.5 million views online per year (or 7.9 million in five years). Second, we find a long tail in both mediums, where 8% of objects were exhibited onsite and 11% of available objects online were used in Wikipedia articles (representing 1% of the total collection). We further document differences in consumer preference for type of object, favouring 3D onsite and 2D online, as well as topic and language preference, favouring Wikipedia articles about geography and in English. Online publication is hence an important complement to onsite exhibitions to increase access to collections. Results shed light on online consumption of heritage content by consumers who may not necessarily visit heritage sites.

[edit] References

This publication has 0 references. Only those references related to wikis are included here: Adler, Thomas et al. (2008) ‘Assigning Trust to Wikipedia Content’ in Proceedings WikiSym. Jullien, Nicolas (2012) ‘What we know about Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s)’ research paper available at SSRN: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2053597. Lehmann, Janette et al. (2014) ‘Reader Preferences and Behaviour on Wikipedia’ in HT’14 Proceedings of the 25th ACM conference on Hypertext and social media. ACM, New York, pp.88-97. Lehmann, Jens et al. (2015) ‘DBpedia – A Large-scale, Multilingual Knowledge Base Extracted from Wikipedia’ in Semantic Web. 6(2):167-195. Mestyan, Marton, Taha Yasseri and Janos Kertesz (2013) ‘Early Prediction of movie Box Office Success Based on Wikipedia Activity Big Data’ in PLOS ONE. 8(8):1-8. Okoli, Chitu et al. (2012) ‘The people’s encyclopedia under the gaze of the sages: A systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia’. SSRN Scholarly Paper, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2021326. Potts, Jason, Stuart Cunningham, John Hartley, Paul Ormerod (2008) ‘Social network markets: a new definition of the creative industries’ in Journal of Cultural Economics. 32(3):167-185. Ratkiewicz, Jacob, Santo Fortunato, Alessandro Flammini, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Vespignani (2010a) ‘Characterizing and Modelling the Dynamics of Online Popularity’ in Physical Review Letters. 105(15):1-4. Ratkiewicz, Jacob, F. Menczer, S. Fortunato, A. Flammini and A. Vespignani (2010b) ‘Traffic in Social Media II: Modeling Bursty Popularity’ in IEEE International Conference on Social Computing. Reinoso, Antonio, Israel Herraiz, Rocio Muñoz-Mansilla, Felipe Ortega (2012) ‘Characterization of the Wikipedia Traffic’ in ICIW 2012: Seventh International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services. IARIA, 2012, pp. 156-162. Spoerri, Anselm (2007a) ‘Visualizing the Overlap between the 100 Most Visited Pages on Wikipedia for September 2006 to January 2007’ in First Monday. 12(4):1-6. Spoerri, Anselm (2007b) ‘What is popular on Wikipedia and why?’ in First Monday. 12(4):1-15.

Cited by

Probably, this publication is cited by others, but there are no articles available for them in WikiPapers.

Discussion

No comments yet. Be first!