|An axiomatic approach for result diversification|
|Author(s)||Gollapudi S., Sharma A.|
|Published in||WWW'09 - Proceedings of the 18th International World Wide Web Conference|
|Keyword(s)||Approximation algorithms, Axiomatic framework, Diversification, Facility dispersion, Search engine, Wikipedia (Extra: Axiomatic approach, Axiomatic framework, Clustering system, Data sets, Diversification, Evaluation methodologies, Explicit knowledge, Product database, Ranking system, User satisfaction, Wikipedia, Approximation algorithms, Dispersions, Websites, Search engines)|
|Article||BASE, CiteSeerX, Google Scholar|
|Web||Ask, Bing, Google (PDF), Yahoo!|
|Download and mirrors|
|Local copy||Not available|
|Remote mirror(s)||Not available|
|Export and share|
|BibTeX, CSV, RDF, JSON|
|Browse properties · List of conference papers|
An axiomatic approach for result diversification is a 2009 conference paper written in English by Gollapudi S., Sharma A. and published in WWW'09 - Proceedings of the 18th International World Wide Web Conference.
Understanding user intent is key to designing an effective ranking system in a search engine. In the absence of any explicit knowledge of user intent, search engines want to diversify results to improve user satisfaction. In such a setting, the probability ranking principle-based approach of presenting the most relevant results on top can be sub-optimal, and hence the search engine would like to trade-off relevance for diversity in the results. In analogy to prior work on ranking and clustering systems, we use the axiomatic approach to characterize and design diversification systems. We develop a set of natural axioms that a diversification system is expected to satisfy, and show that no diversification function can satisfy all the axioms simultaneously. We illustrate the use of the axiomatic framework by providing three example diversification objectives that satisfy different subsets of the axioms. We also uncover a rich link to the facility dispersion problem that results in algorithms for a number of diversification objectives. Finally, we propose an evaluation methodology to characterize the objectives and the underlying axioms. We conduct a large scale evaluation of our objectives based on two data sets: a data set derived from the Wikipedia disambiguation pages and a product database. Copyright is held by the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2).
- This section requires expansion. Please, help!
Probably, this publication is cited by others, but there are no articles available for them in WikiPapers. Cited 85 time(s)